Showing posts with label Hamas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hamas. Show all posts

Thursday, August 2, 2018

Why Is Israel Spending $500m to Protect Gas Facilities Close to Home? - HAARETZ

Aug 02, 2018 6:04 AM
Hagai Amit
The navy is ordering ships designed to protect drilling platforms far from the coast, even though they will be just 10 kilometers from the shore

The debate under way over how far offshore the natural gas production platforms should be located raises another question about why Israel’s navy is spending 430 million euros ($502 million) to buy four corvettes from Germany.

If plans to locate the facility 10 kilometers from Israel’s coast go ahead as planned, despite protests of residents near Dor Beach concerned about the environmental impact, the Israel Navy will be equipped with a fleet of expensive firepower completely disproportionate to the threats it will face.

The platform, which is being built in Texas and is due to arrive in about six months, will service the giant Leviathan field when it goes into production.

Sunday, April 22, 2018

IDF reveals names of four new gas field-defending Sa’ar 6 warships - THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

Sa'ar Class 5 Corvette
22 April 2018, 7:45 pm
JUDAH ARI GROSS

The Israeli Navy on Sunday announced the names of its four new Sa’ar 6-class corvettes, the first of which is due to be delivered by the end of 2019.

The ships will be named “Magen,” meaning shield; “Oz,” meaning valor; “Atzmaut,” meaning independence; and “Nitzahon,” meaning victory.

The first corvette is scheduled to arrive in late 2019. The other three will be delivered by the beginning of 2021.

The ships are far larger and more powerful than the Sa’ar 5-class warships — currently Israel’s biggest — and are specifically meant to protect the country’s gas field and shipping lanes.

“The arrival of the ships will significantly change the face of the Navy,” said the head of the Israeli Navy Maj. Gen. Eli Sharvit.

“The navy will operate vessels with new capabilities that we do not currently possess,” he said.

Sunday, July 3, 2016

INTO THE FRAY: Utterly Unconscionable - THE JEWISH PRESS

By: Dr. Martin Sherman
Published: July 3rd, 2016

The real reason for the rupture of relations with Turkey is not because of anything Israel has (or has not) done. It is a result of what Turkey has become.

Israelis have no conscience, no honor, no pride. Those who condemn Hitler day and night have surpassed Hitler in barbarism. – Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, (7/19/2014)
National honor is not just something people talk of on the street…It has strategic significance – Moshe (Bogey) Yaalon, Israel’s Deputy Prime Minister, (8/17/2011).
The recently announced reconciliation accord—or rather “deal” between Israel and Turkey—is utterly unconscionable—and incomprehensible. From an Israeli point of view, it is devoid of any logic on every imaginable level—national, ethical, security and even commercial—except perhaps in the immediate short-term.

Friday, June 17, 2016

Israeli partners line up Tamar, Leviathan rig - NATURAL GAS EUROPE

June 17th, 2016

The controlling stakeholders offshore Israel – Noble Energy and Delek Group – are moving forward in their expansion and development plans for Tamar and Leviathan gas fields by trying to coordinate and schedule a sequence of drilling operations between the two projects.

A source told NGE that a tender was issued for a drilling rig, which is supposed to arrive at Israel later this year. The rig will drill a new well at Tamar field, Tamar 5, the source said. The new well is part of the expansion plan for the already producing field.

Speaking at the Herzeliya Conference June 16, Delek Group CEO Yossi Abu said that by the end of the year a drilling rig would arrive in Israeli waters. However he did not refer to the Tamar field. Drilling production wells in Leviathan will follow final investment decision at the end of this year, so not before the second half of next year, at the earliest.

Sunday, December 20, 2015

An Israeli Gas Pipeline to Turkey? Bad Idea | National Review

December 20, 2015
DANIEL PIPES

News that the Turkish and Israeli governments are about to renew full diplomatic relations after years of tensions causes me to smile cynically — and to worry again about Israeli gullibility. 


The two states enjoyed close relations in the 1990s, when a common world outlook led to a strong military bond, growing trade, and exchanges of people and culture. Writing in 1997, I characterized this bilateral as having “the potential to alter the strategic map of the Middle East, to reshape American alliances there, and to reduce Israel’s regional isolation.” 

Israeli Navy to Install Anti-Rocket Missiles on Patrol Boats to Defend Gas Rigs | Natural Gas Europe

December 20th, 2015 - The Israeli navy will install missiles on its patrol boats, in order to protect off shore natural gas infrastructure, reported Ha'aretz daily, a reliable Israeli daily.

Although the report hasn’t divulged on the missiles' operating system, the missiles themselves will be taken from the Iron Dome system, a mobile system capable of intercepting short aerial objects, including short range rockets. The missiles will be installed on Saar 5, an Israeli patrol boat.

The Iron Dome system was designed to intercept short range rockets such as those used by Hamas, the Palestinian group that controls Gaza Strip. Last week the chief of Israel's National Security Council, revealed that Hamas attempted to shoot at Israel's natural gas infrastructure, during operation Protective Edge, in the summer of 2014, but missed because the weapons were not sophisticated enough. However, he added that now Hamas is in possession of more sophisticated weapons.

The Iron Dome system was developed in the last few years by Israeli companies and its interception ability was proven during the 2014 Protective Edge operation, in which it is assumed that about 90% of all launches were successful, i.e. destroyed the rockets that were targeted at civilians and other targets.

The Iron Dome is a mobile short range anti rocket system and became operational in 2011. By late October 2014, the system had intercepted 1,200 rockets. However so far the Iron Dome was operated only from land and operating it from sea will set new challenges to its developers. Iron Dome installation on the patrol boats is a filling the gap step until the arrival of new battle ships, Saar 6 model, that are expected to enter service in the Israeli navy around 2019. Those boats will be equipped with Barak 8 system, an anti-missile system.

According to the report, the Israeli navy also plans to increase intelligence gathering in areas around the rigs and also to buy satellite hours from private satellite operators in order to enhance its intelligence gathering capabilities.

"We must ensure that the gas will continue to flow. There is no other option because there is no redundancy and there are no other energy reserves," a navy officer was quoted by Ha'aretz. The officer also supported the approval of the natural gas regulatory framework and said that the delay in its implementation already enabled the IDF to improve its preparations.

Ya'acov Zalel

Source

Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Interview with Formr Israeli Navy Chief: Marine Infrastructure Security Not Just Israel's Problem


December 01st, 2015

INTERVIEW WITH FORMER ISRAELI NAVY CHIEF: MARINE INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY NOT JUST ISRAEL'S PROBLEM

Eastern Mediterranean security matters came up during the UOG 2015 conference held last week in Tel Aviv, Israel.
One of the speakers at the event was Vice Admiral (Ret.), David Ben-Bashat, formerly the Israeli navy commander in chief, a position he held from 2004 to 2008. Following his presentation to the conference, Natural Gas Europe conducted an interview with Mr. Ben-Bashat.
NGE: How difficult is it to attack and harm Israeli natural gas infrastructure at sea?
Ben Bashsat: Generally it depends on a few elements, among them the platform's distance from the shore, who the guy is [who wants to cause harm], what kind of terrorist activity, and the operational capability.
If you ask specifically for this region, then we know that there are intentions from the Gaza Strip, where Hamas, a terrorist group, is in control, and from Lebanon where Hezbollah, also a terrorist group, has military means. They have even declared that they can do it. We know of a few attempts [to strike at Israeli marine natural gas assets] by Hamas [from Gaza] that fortunately were unsuccessful. Currently the Hezbollah [because of an involvement in Syria] is not involved in such activities, though the organisation still declares [those intentions]. We, as Israel, are defending ourselves and I believe that we have the right tools to defend ourselves.
NGE: Are the natural gas platforms immune from terrorist attacks?
Ben Bashsat: We are dealing here with terrorist organizations, not a normal country with a government. Such organisations don’t always behave responsibly. Hezbollah has already shot some merchant ships in the region. Therefore if they decide to do something, they don’t care if their actions might harm innocent civilians. And therefore we need to take into consideration that they will not always behave logically. When you are talking about a platform that is in a fixed
Vice Admiral (Ret.), David Ben-Bashat, formerly the
Israeli navy commander in chief
position, then it is not a big deal for them to find exactly where the platform is located. Therefore, they can make all the preparations and they can get Iranian support or some other organizations' support. We need to take it as a serious threat and that is what Israel does. We take it seriously. And we are organizing ourselves for that.
NGE: What kind of threats is the infrastructure exposed to?
Ben Bashat: We need to consider threats on the water, underwater, from the air and from the shore. We are preparing the answers and this is a combination between [private] forces on the platforms, which are trained, taught and guided by us [the Israeli military], and the envelope around the area that is controlled and patrolled by military forces like the Israeli navy. It is not always an easy task to accomplish, but we do it. Thanks to good intelligence we have good replies to all threats and scenarios.
NGE: What are the possible aerial threats?
Ben Bashsat: Syria and Hezbollah possess missiles that can hit marine objects. There is also a possibility of operating a UAV [Unmanned Aerial Vehicle] which can carry explosives. However, the Israeli Navy is well equipped and has an answer to any scenario.
NGE: How important are the four battle ships that the Israeli navy has ordered from Germany in order to defend the country's offshore resources?
Ben Bashsat: Very important. We started it a long time ago. The navy started the push to get [the battle ships]. But Israel has limited resources. However, the government became aware of the need to protect our energy resources and those are far away from the Israeli shore. Our enemies might have the capability to hit them, and therefore, it is very important to upgrade the fleet with ships that can stay at sea [for a long period] and to be around. You need to be there. There is no vacuum [on the sea]. You need to have the picture and to be able to respond quickly at the moment of need.
NGE: How do you see the Russian involvement in the region?
Ben Bashsat: As it was published, the involvement of Russia in Syria is coordinated with Israel. There were meetings between senior officers from both sides. But we still have to watch, though at least there is a coordination. I remember from the Soviet times that the Russians were there without any coordination with us.
NGE: Is Russia's presence in the Middle East posing a threat to Israeli gas interests, like possible natural gas deals with Turkey?
Ben Bashsat: Right now we are not dealing with Turkey [a potential customer for Israeli gas]. Maybe when we make gas deals with Turkey and when contracts are signed, we'll have to find a way to talk to the Russians. Right now it is far away [in the future].
However if Turkey improves relationships with us it will be a big benefit for Israel. They need it so why not do it? Right now I don’t see Erdogan rushing to improve the relationship with Israel. But I also hear rumours that something might happen [between Israel and Turkey]. Maybe the gas will be a leverage for rapprochement between the two countries. For us it is very important. That was the way it was before Erdogan came to power. And it is important for us to cooperate one day with Turkey.
****
Since the interview was conducted before the incident in which Turkey shot down a Russian fighter jet, I returned to Mr. Ben Bashat and asked him to adapt his answers to the new situation.
"This incident would not lead to war," he said, referring to the incident. "However it is raising the tension between the two countries. So now they have to be very careful in what they do. I see it as a message from Turkey to Russia. So far there are no implications on the Mediterranean and it is more an affair between Russia and Turkey. If the confrontation is not exaggerated by one of the sides, a routine will be resumed.
NGE: Is the security situation of other countries in the region different from Israel's?
Ben Bashsat: I believe that Egypt and Cyprus share the same security challenges as Israel. Therefore, I see room for cooperation between the countries. We can share the [military] picture, the capability, the concept, the intelligence, because this Jihadist international terrorism is aimed at anybody: Americans, Europeans, Middle East countries, Saudi Arabia. Everybody has to be aware of the dangers. [In that respect] Israel is not unique any more."
NGE: So what should be done?
Ben Bahsat: In this region we need to work together--public forces with private. You need to involve other countries in the region. We need to build a security platform among Israel, Cyprus and Greece and invite other countries like Jordan and Egypt to join. In that case, it is win-win-win situation. It concerns not only gas; it is a very strong leverage for other issues.
Ya'acov Zalel


 Natural Gas Europe welcomes all viewpoints. Should you wish to provide an alternative perspective on the above article, please contact editor@minoils.com  
Kindly note that we only lightly edit content for grammar and do not edit externally contributed content.

Friday, October 23, 2015

Commentator: Putin Wants Gazprom To Take Part In Israel's Leviathan | Natural Gas Europe

COMMENTATOR: PUTIN WANTS GAZPROM TO TAKE PART IN ISRAEL'S LEVIATHAN

Ehud Yaari, a veteran Israeli journalist and commentator for Arab issues for Channel 2 News, the most watched and influential TV news broadcast in Israel, has said that Russian President Vladimir Putin is interested in Gazprom entering into Israeli natural gas sector.
Yaari was quoted by the The Australian, after speaking in an event in Sydney.  Mr. Yaari said that Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who opposed a previous deal with Gazprom, is now reconsidering his position.
However while the previous deal from 2012 was about Gazprom buying LNG from Tamar gas field, the current option of interest for Russia is for Gazprom to be involved in the development of Leviathan gas field.
According to The Australian, Mr. Putin told Mr. Netanyahu that in return for a deal “we will make sure there will be no provocation against the [Israeli] gas fields by Hezbollah or Hamas. Nobody messes with us.”
Ya'acov Zalel

Source: http://www.naturalgaseurope.com/putin-gazprom-interested-in-leviathan-israel-gas-26000

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Israel's Zero Gas Game | Journal of Energy Security

Israel's Zero Gas Game

E-mailPrintPDF
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
When natural gas was first discovered off of Israel’s coast, analysts and pundits, myself included, identified the finds as a “geopolitical game changer.” Some even went as far as to refer to Israel as an emerging energy superpower – a Qatar in the making.  The country’s vibrant society was euphoric and consumed with speculation about how the windfall of natural gas revenues would be used and how natural gas exports to Asia, Europe and even to neighboring Turkey and Jordan might improve Israel’s strategic posture. Such discussions were not meritless. The natural gas discoveries, nearly 900 billion cubic meters, were among the world’s recent largest, and the involvement of a competent Houston-based company, Noble Energy, in the recovery process instilled confidence in the prospects of turning Israel into a non-trivial part of the global natural gas landscape. After six decades of total dependency on foreign sources of energy Israel was suddenly not only on the cusp of an era of energy self-sufficiency but also well on its way to becoming a net energy exporter and the proud owner of natural gas revenues and a  derived $100 billion sovereign wealth fund. This vision is drifting further away by the day. Israel has made all the right moves to squander its gas bonanza and scare off foreign investors to a point that the celebrated gas discoveries might turn into a huge missed opportunity.

Drilling for oil and gas in deep waters is the most risky endeavor in the energy industry. Doing so on a rig in the Eastern Mediterranean within the range of Hamas and Hizballah missiles is doubly risky. Working in Israel also carries a political price for companies vying to work in oil-rich Arab countries. No wonder international energy companies showed little enthusiasm for participating in exploration activities in Israel’s economic waters. But instead of giving the royal treatment to the few dare devils that did take the risk, Israel chose to give them a hard time.

Shortly after gas discoveries were made public in 2009, civil uproar began due to a sense that the public would not get its fair share of the revenues to come. Responding to pressure, in 2010 the government of Israel appointed a national commission to examine the royalty structure for oil and gas companies and to find ways to increase the public’s gain from the country’s natural resources. The following year, the commission recommended a repeal of the depreciation allowance and the introduction of a progressive tax between 20-60 % on oil and gas profits in addition to the existing 12.5%  royalty level. By international standards these were not draconian measures but changing the rules midgame had a chilling effect on energy companies considering to follow Noble Energy’s footsteps. After all, if rules can change once who is to say they won't change again?

It was only the beginning. A new controversy quickly emerged: how much of the gas should be reserved for the domestic market and how much should be allowed for export? The answer to this question would determine the willingness of companies to invest billions of dollars in developing the large 500 billion cubic meter (bcm) reservoir called Leviathan as well as in the infrastructure required to export the gas as LNG. The Israeli market is too small to absorb vast amounts of natural gas, and without a guaranteed market - which exports would provide - such an investment makes no sense. Thus a new governmental commission to determine the export allowance was formed. After a year of deliberations the commission decided to cap exports at 53%  of reserves, but succumbing to public pressure the cabinet reduced the figure to 40%.   This was not the end of it. The Israeli Supreme Court was inundated with appeals to repeal the cabinet decision, blocking exports altogether, and no resolution of the matter is in sight.
The international response was swift and painful. Australian energy giant Woodside Petroleum which had agreed to buy a 30% stake in the Leviathan project under the assumption that at least 50% of the natural gas would be allocated to exports got cold feet and held off on its $700 million payment. To make matters worse, in June 2013 Israel’s Minister of the Treasury Yair Lapid, under the influence of the social protests and the mounting pressure to identify new sources of income to balance the national budget, appointed yet another commission to reexamine – again – the public’s share in natural resources. The commission is scheduled to present its recommendations by June 2014, but its deliberations were postponed due to an appeal to the Israeli Supreme Court on the grounds of insufficient representation of women in it.

All these flip-flops, time delays and bureaucratic hurdles by consecutive Israeli governments seriously damaged Israel’s appeal as a target of investment in the eyes of the multi-trillion dollar energy industry. This would have been tolerable had Israel been the only player in the East Med theater. It isn’t. Cyprus, Lebanon and Turkey all have access to the same geological formation and with more gusto and decisiveness could overtake Israel in siphoning the gas, building infrastructure for export and locking-in long term supply contracts with gas importing countries. In fact, in spite of the economic basket case as it is, Cyprus has already signed deals with France’s Total, Italy’s Eni, South Korea’s Kogas and Noble Energy to explore the island’s new-found gas potential. After losing faith in Israel,  Woodside is considering joining a consortium to build an LNG export terminal there.

All this to say that Israel, the trigger for the East Med gas rush and the front-runner in its potential to bring gas to market, is rapidly losing its competitive edge, and its dreams of energy grandeur may soon evaporate. The combination of hyperactive, overly regulated democracy, an increasingly vocal green movement, and a socialistic streak in society preferring not to have natural gas revenues at all rather than see a few risk taking “tycoons” become richer, is proving fatal for the nascent Israeli energy industry.

While much damage has been done hope is not lost. Israel can still snap out of its bureaucratic paralysis, restore investors’ confidence and show the world it is open for business. In the coming months the government and the legislature must present a clear vision for the country’s energy sector, articulate the rights and responsibilities of foreign investors and trim down, rather than add, regulatory hurdles. Most importantly they should set rules and stick to them. Failure to do so will fizzle the Israeli gas dream. The gas will be left in the ground and the startup nation will be more worthy of the title ‘shutdown nation’.
Contributor Gal Luft is co-director of the Washington DC based Institute for the Analysis of Global Security (IAGS) and Senior Adviser to the United States Energy Security Council (USESC).


Link to article: http://www.ensec.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=455%3Aisraels-zero-gas-game&catid=137%3Aissue-content&Itemid=422

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Islamist Turkey could destabilize region in quest for natural gas reserves | WolrdTribune.com

Tuesday, July 30th, 2013 | Posted by WorldTribune.com

WASHINGTON — The United States must increase vigilance over Turkey amid the development of energy resources in the eastern Mediterranean, a report said.

The American Enterprise Institute asserted that Turkey could use its huge military to destabilize the eastern Mediterranean in the competition for natural gas reserves.

Turkey is said to have the strongest navy in the region.

The institute cited Turkish threats to use its Navy to resolve disputes, particularly with the Republic of Cyprus.